Legal Opinion

Pitzer v. City of East Peoria

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided April 21, 2010No. Case 08-cv-1120PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & OPINION

JOE BILLY McDADE, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. 1 (Docs. 55, 60, 61, 58). Plaintiff has responded in opposition to each of the Motions to Dismiss. (Docs. 64, 65, 66, 67). For the reasons stated below, the East Peoria De fendants’ and the Peoria County Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are denied, and the Tazewell County Defendants’ and the Pekin Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are granted.

Legal Standard

“In ruling on Rule 12(b)(6) motions, the court must treat all well-pleaded allegations as true and draw all inferences in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Doxtator v. O'BrienDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
Mariah Marshall v. Kendall County Sheriff Deputy Lentini, in his official and individual capacity, Kendall County Sheriff Deputy Blouin, in his official and individual capacity, Village of Oswego Officer Hayes, in her official and individual capacity, The Village of Oswego, and Kendall County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026