Legal Opinion

Winn v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 30, 1996No. 07-95-0169-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Senior Justice.

Finding appellant Gary E. Winn guilty of the murder of his grandmother Lillian Winn, the victim, a jury assessed his punishment at confinement for 99 years. Contending the trial court erred in admitting evidence that he was the beneficiary of a trust payable on the victim’s death, appellant seeks a reversal and new trial. We will affirm.

Although appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, a summary of the evidence is appropriate for a positioning of his sole point of error. Ruby Roberts testified, via a videotaped…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Jernigan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bjorgaard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
  2. Krebsbach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  3. Eby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  4. Christian Bjorgaard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
  5. Christian Bjorgaard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API