Bjorgaard v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.
Christian Bjorgaard (appellant) appeals his conviction for attempted sexual assault. Via four issues, he contends that 1) the trial court erred in allowing the State to present evidence, during the guilt phase of the trial, of a prior conviction, 2) the trial court erred in overruling his request to dismiss a member of the jury during trial after the juror disclosed that he was acquainted with the victim’s father, 3) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and 4) the trial court erred by failing to hold a hearing on his motions for new trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Motilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Newton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
- Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- Estes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Anthony G. Hereford, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
- Arnaldo Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.