People v. Seltzer
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, Acting P. J.
Defendants were charged in the Beverly Hills Municipal Court with exhibiting an obscene film, to wit, “Man and Wife.” It was stipulated that the same film was involved in a prior criminal prose*Supp. 54cution entitled People v. Levine, in the Fresno Municipal Court; that an order of dismissal was entered therein after a pretrial on-the-merits determination that the film was not obscene (see People v. Noroff (1967) 67 Cal.2d 791 [63 Cal.Rptr. 575, 433 P.2d 479]); that the order was affirmed on appeal to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Fresno County; and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Lopez v. Emergency Service Restoration, Inc. (In Re Lopez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kelly v. Trans Globe Travel Bureau, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Woodford v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Everett Lopez v. Emergency Service RestorationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.