Colacioppo Et Ux. v. Holcombe
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to open a judgment entered under Rule 1047 of the Pa. Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides: “The prothonotary, on praecipe of the plaintiff, shall enter judgment against a defendant by whom no appearance or pleading to the complaint is filed. In this case, the damages shall be assessed at a trial at which the issues shall be limited to the amount of the damages.” A motion to strike the judgment was also made but at the oral argument and in appellant’s brief it is stated that “counsel for the Appellant will…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Pinsky v. MasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. BorishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Horning v. DavidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Texas & Block House Fish & Game Club v. Bonnell Run Hunting & Fishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Spilove v. Cross Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Coury v. TsapisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Bethlehem Apparatus Co. v. H. N. Crowder, Jr., Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.