Legal Opinion

Horning v. David

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1939No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an appeal from an. order of the court below making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment should not be opened. A summons in trespass was served personally on the defendant February 26, 1938, but through neglect of defendant’s counsel an appearance was not entered for the defendant. The case was in due course placed on a trial list and was tried on May 16, 1938, without the presence or actual knowledge of defendant or his counsel. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff and judgment was entered on May 28,1938. On August 10, 1938, on petition of defendant, a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Kelber v. Pittsb. N. Plow Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
  4. National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Rambo Building & Loan Ass'n v. DragoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Pinsky v. MasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Texas & Block House Fish & Game Club v. Bonnell Run Hunting & Fishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Borjes v. WichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API