Legal Opinion

Friedman v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided December 16, 1936No. Claim No. 24483PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

This is a motion made by claimant for an examination of witnesses before trial, and for an order permitting claimant to inspect and discover records and to make extracts therefrom, and to examine witnesses with respect thereto, and to inspect and discover and photograph the premises where the accident is alleged to have occurred.

There is no statutory authority for the examination, inspection or discovery sought by the claimant. The Court of Claims Act and Rules of the Court of Claims make no provision for such examination or discovery. The fact that plaintiff is a representative of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bush Terminal Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Langdon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1936
  4. Cooper v. Village of BrockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Buchalter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Rucker v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ely v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Schmiedel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API