Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant board of education, and by his father to recover for loss of services, etc., a motion has been made to examine said defendant before trial as an adverse party, pursuant to sections 288 et seq. of the Civil Practice Act, through certain of its employees, namely, the cleaner or custodian in charge of Public School 115, the teacher in charge of the class in which the infant plantiff was duly enrolled, and the teacher or principal in *732charge of said…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Bassett v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Herman v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Ham v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Jewish Hospital v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kasitch v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Rucker v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Rucker v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API