Legal Opinion
Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided July 27, 1940No. Claim No. 25371PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, P. J.
This is a motion made by the claimant, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 17 of the Court of Claims Act, to secure an order of the court permitting the examination of the State before trial.
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Fourth Department, reversed an award herein made by the Court of Claims and granted a new trial (259 App. Div. 440). A statement of the claim and of the pertinent provisions of the contract appear in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dowling. The claimant and the State entered into a contract for excavation work in the Barge Canal. Sheet 3 of section 1 of the plans…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Shonts v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Strong & Trowbridge Co. v. Defiance Machine WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Terry v. Ross Heater & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Citizens Trust Co. v. R. Prescott & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Westphal v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Van Heuverzwyn v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Thomas v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
- Wager v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
- Claim of Torres v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.