Mulli v. Mulli
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Defendant Marion Mulli appeals on the judgment roll only from that part of a judgment which decrees that plaintiff Viva Armstrong Mulli and the Estate of Jack Mulli, also known as John Herman Jansen, Deceased, are the owners of an undivided one-half interest in the real property located at 121 San Pablo Avenue, San Francisco, California and orders said defendant to convey forthwith to the said plaintiffs an undivided one-half interest in said real property. The only question presented on this appeal is whether or not the findings are sufficient as a matter of law to support said judgment.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Stevenson v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gabitzsch v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Alton v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Maddox v. RainoldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.