Legal Opinion

Mulli v. Mulli

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1951No. Civ. 14364PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Defendant Marion Mulli appeals on the judgment roll only from that part of a judgment which decrees that plaintiff Viva Armstrong Mulli and the Estate of Jack Mulli, also known as John Herman Jansen, Deceased, are the owners of an undivided one-half interest in the real property located at 121 San Pablo Avenue, San Francisco, California and orders said defendant to convey forthwith to the said plaintiffs an undivided one-half interest in said real property. The only question presented on this appeal is whether or not the findings are sufficient as a matter of law to support said judgment.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Stevenson v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Gabitzsch v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Alton v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Maddox v. RainoldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API