Legal Opinion
Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. State
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1998No. Docket No. 111782, 111785PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, C.J.
In the case of Judicial Attorneys Ass’n v State of Michigan, we granted leave to determine whether a provision of 1996 PA 374, MCL 600.593a; MSA 27A.593a, violates the Separation of Powers Clause of Const 1963, art 3, § 2, and the rights *294of members of the plaintiffs under the public employee relations act (pera), MCL 423.201 et seq.-, MSA 17.455(1) et seq. 457 Mich 883 (1998).
We hold that subsections 593a(3):(10) and the parallel provisions of §§ 591, 837, 8271, 8273 and 8274 of 1996 PA 374, concerning employees of the circuit, probate, and district courts, are unconstitutional. This finding…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Pucci v. Nineteenth District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.