Legal Opinion

Krotz v. CSX Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s intestate was killed when his car collided with a train at a railroad crossing. Plaintiff claims that the owners of the property abutting the intersection of the highway and the railroad right-of-way are liable for uncut bushes on their property which obstructed the decedent’s view of the oncoming train. We agree with Special Term that there is no common-law duty imposed upon a landowner to control the vegetation on his property for the benefit of users of a public highway (see, Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 57, at 390 [5th ed];…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. MalkanNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Driggers v. LockeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Barnes v. Stone-QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Ingenito v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Lubitz v. Village of ScarsdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Clementoni v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API