Legal Opinion
Ingenito v. Rosen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Robert M. Rosen, P. C., Robert M. Rosen, Diane Saunders, also known as Diane Rosen, Mary Ugurlu and Keti Callas separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated September 27, 1990, which, in effect, denied their respective motions and cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the appellants’ motions are granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Krotz v. CSX Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barnes v. Stone-QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Echorst v. KaimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Cain v. PappalardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kolkmeyer v. Westhampton Taxi & Limo ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- McSweeney v. RoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.