Legal Opinion

American Tri-Ergon Corp. v. Paramount Publix Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 4, 1934No. 439PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit is for infringement of patent No. 1,825,598, a process for producing combined sound and picture films. It is called “sound on film.” The application for the patent was filed March 29, 1922, and granted September 20, 1931, after a long interference proceeding with De Forest patent, No. 3,489,314, which was finally decided by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in appellant’s favor. De Forest v. Vogt, Massolle & Engl, 49 F. (2d) 1075. Prompt prosecution for this infringement followed.

Appellee is a producer of talking motion pictures, and practices this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Du Bois v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. American Graphophone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  4. Auto Pneumatic Action Co. v. Kindler & CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. Novadel Process Corporation v. JP Meyer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  4. In Re Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  5. Western Electric Co. v. General Talking Pictures Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API