Legal Opinion
In Re Paramount Publix Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
Three alleged creditors filed proofs of claim against the bankrupt, each of the claims being for profits said to have been realized by the bankrupt through infringement of the claimant’s patents. The referee expunged the claims on the ground that claims of this character were not provable in bankruptcy against the estate of an infringer. While the fact seems to be of no importance, passing notice may be taken that on one of the claims suit for infringement had been commenced against the bankrupt prior to bankruptcy, and the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goldsmith v. Overseas Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Copeland v. Emroy Investors, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- A & M Records, Inc. v. M.V.C. Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- DeLeon v. Gurda Farms, Inc. (In Re Gurda Farms, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In Re Progress Lektro Shave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.