White Oak Fuel Co. v. Carter
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
' In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action at law by Bertram U. Carter and others against the White Oak Fuel Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.'
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
The White Oak Euel Company, hereafter called defendant, entered into a written contract with Carter Bros. Company, hereafter called plaintiff, by the terms of which the defendant agreed to furnish to plaintiff 4 to 6 cars per month of White Oak special 2-inch lump coal, at $1.42% per ton, and 5 to 8 cars per month of White Oak special 6-inch lump coal, at $1.57% per ton, free on board plaintiff’s switch in East St. I,ouis, 111., in regularly scattered monthly shipments beginning August 7, 1916, and ending April 1, 1917. The plaintiff agreed to receive all the coal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Reddish v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Sundgren v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Norris v. LetchworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- John A. Gauger & Co. v. Sawyer & Austin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- In Re Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- American Refining Co. v. BartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Peter Fox Brewing Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.