Legal Opinion

Grabill v. Worthington Industries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1993No. Nos. 93AP-770 to 93AP-772 and 93AP-775PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Judge.

Defendants-appellees, American Electric Power Company (“AEP”) and Columbus Southern Power Company (“CSPC”), have filed a motion to dismiss the appeals of plaintiffs-appellants. Defendants argue that this court does not have jurisdiction because the orders appealed from are not final appealable orders.

Plaintiffs filed four separate cases. Case No. 93AP-770 involves plaintiff Jeffrey L. Grabill and defendants Worthington Industries (“Worthington”), CSPC, AEP, Magnetek-Ohio Transformer Corporation, f.k.a. Ohio Transformer Corporation (“Ohio Transformer”), and Rustgo Company.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. KeefeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Winchell v. BurchOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Dray v. Gen. Motors Corp., Unpublished Decision (1-30-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Grabill v. Worthington Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. KeefeOhio Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API