Legal Opinion
Winchell v. Burch
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 1996No. 95-P-0150PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christley, Judge.
Appellants, H.H. Forsyth and Nancy K. Winchell, and appellees, Donald and Grace Burch, own contiguous condominiums in the Oaks of Aurora Condominiums (“Oaks”) in Aurora, Ohio. Each two-unit condominium at the Oaks was con structed with each unit having a “limited common area” consisting of a patio and second-floor deck directly overhead. 1
On April 26, 1991, a condominium plat and drawings, condominium declaration, and association bylaws were filed with the Portage County Recorder by Seneca Partnership, the developer, pursuant to R.C. 5311.06(A). The plat demonstrated the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Neil v. AtwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Grabill v. Worthington Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- McCarthy v. LippittOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc. v. Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Allason v. GaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Orrenmaa v. Cti Audio, Inc., 2007-A-0088 (8-22-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.