Margaret C. Jacob, Etc. v. Gregory Curt
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of that court’s reasoning on the issue of proximate cause. See Jacob v. Curt, 721 F.Supp. 1536, 1540-41 (D.R.I. 1989). We add only the following brief remarks:
1. We reject appellant s contention that the district court improperly treated defendant’s motion for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) as -a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56. We read the court’s opinion to hold that, based on the allegations in the complaint, appellant failed as a matter of law to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. A plaintiff is not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wolfgang Arnold v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Beresford N. Springer v. Gretchen SeamanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Jacob v. CurtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garita Hotel Limited Partnership, Etc. v. Ponce Federal Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Howard H. Gilbert, Jr. v. City of CambridgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Vargas-Colon v. Fundacion Damas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Majebe v. North Carolina Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.