Legal Opinion
United States v. Emil K. Schandl
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 20, 1991No. 90-5179PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant, Emil K. Schandl, was convicted of four counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 and one count of failure to file a tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. On appeal, Schandl seeks reversal of his conviction on the grounds that the district court wrongly denied two motions: (1) a motion to suppress evidence seized at Schandl’s home and office; and (2) a motion requesting early release of jury panel information needed to access certain tax background information of potential jurors under 26 U.S.C. § 6103(h)(5). We find no error with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States v. George WuagneuxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. J. Clenton Henson (87-5132) Sheila Henson Lutz (87-5138) & C. Alan Henson (87-5144)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Edward D. Patterson, Richard L. Flintoff, Jimmie R. Oglesby, and Gregory C. MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Willi Beusch and Deak & Company of California, Inc., United States of America v. Willi Beusch and Deak & Company of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Daniel J. Leveto v. Robert A. LapinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. UphamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Copple, John R., an Individual Mechem Financial Incorporated, a Corporation, John R. CoppleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charley HargusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Leveto v. LapinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.