Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward D. Patterson, Richard L. Flintoff, Jimmie R. Oglesby, and Gregory C. Martinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1981No. 79-1368 to 79-1371PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

The appellants were convicted of narcotics offenses. Patterson, Flintoff, and Martinson, who were tried by a jury, contend that some jurors were prejudiced and that the court erred in several respects. Ogles-by, who was tried by the court, challenges its refusal to suppress evidence taken from him after he was stopped by federal agents.

I. FACTS

Flintoff, accompanied by Shevalier1 and informant Wood, met undercover agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in Tacoma and arranged to sell them cocaine and heroin. The agents paid Shevalier for the drugs at…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. People v. HoveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. GarceauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. United States v. Riad Abed Al-AzzawyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API