Legal Opinion

Oliver S. Revell Estate v. Herron

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1940No. 29609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

The plaintiffs own a 40-acre tract of land. Surrounding it on the west, north, and east sides is a 200-acre tract formerly owned by Joseph Herron. For many years an old fence had marked what was supposed to be the north boundary of plaintiffs’ 40-acre tract. The Herron land was cleared and cultivated down to the fence line, and the land to the south, belonging to plaintiffs, had never been cleared.

About four years prior to the commencement of this action Joseph Herron moved a small two-room box house, then situated on the northwest portion of his tract, to a point just north of the fence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Frost v. SchinkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Robb v. DobrinskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Akers v. HintergardtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Cherokee Pipe Line Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API