Legal Opinion

Cherokee Pipe Line Co. v. Newman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1979No. 49926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff in the trial court, Cherokee Pipe Line Company (Cherokee), from judgment denying injunctions against the defendants, Davis and Newman. Cherokee originally filed separate actions against the two defendants, but since in all pertinent details the actions involved the same issues, with identical pleadings except for the names of defendants and land descriptions, they were consolidated for purposes of trial, separate judgments were filed, and plaintiff combined its appeals into one petition in error.

In the trial court, Cherokee alleged that it was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay County Gas Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Carte-Caldwell v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Kirk v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Irwin v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Oliver S. Revell Estate v. HerronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. State Department of Assessments and TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Liberty Lake Sewer District No. 1 v. Liberty Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Lingleville Independent School District v. Valero Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1989
  4. Dorchester Master Ltd. Partnership v. Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Navarro v. Lucas (In Re K & a Servicing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API