Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kozak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, 307PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

Following a non-jury trial, the appellant, Dolores J. Kozak, was found guilty of possession of marijuana and possession with intent to deliver marijuana.1 She con*350tends that the search and seizure by the private individual of two suitcases containing the marijuana was unlawful and that the evidence obtained should have been suppressed, and that the search made pursuant to the warrant was also invalid because the warrant was based on illegally obtained information. We find no merit in these contentions and will, therefore, affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. John CapraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Samuel Gold, Howard Guy Halbett, John Frank Fusco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. EshelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. WeissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. EshelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API