Legal Opinion
Omerza v. Bryant, 2006-L-147 (9-28-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 2007No. 2006-L-147PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Bryant Stratton College ("Bryant Stratton"), appeals the trial court's May 8, 2006 and May 9, 2006 judgment entries overruling their motions for sanctions filed against appellee, Philip Berardinelli, Inc. ("PBI").
{¶ 2} Statement of Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 3} This appeal stems from a lawsuit brought by PBI against Bryant Stratton alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ("TCPA"), Section 227, Title 47, U.S. Code.1 Specifically, PBI claimed that it had received an unsolicited advertisement from Bryant Stratton via facsimile ("fax") in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Stone v. House of Day Funeral Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keith-Harper v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- N. Star Med. Research, L.L.C. v. KozlovichOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Lane v. GriffithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bluhm v. Corrado, 2007-A-0037 (12-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Harvard Mortgage Corporation v. Phillips, 2007-G-2783 (3-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.