Legal Opinion

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Burns

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1938No. 13773PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

This appeal involves certain provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, contained in Articles 8306 et seq., Rev.Civ.St, and amendments thereto, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.

Plaintiff, A. V. Burns, was the employee, defendant, Traders & General Insurance Company, was the carrier of compensation insurance, and Worth Mills, Inc., was the employer and subscriber.

Plaintiff alleged all necessary jurisdictional grounds, and that for several years he had been in the employ of Worth Mills, Inc., until on June 23rd, 1936, while in the discharge of duty as an employee, he…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  4. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. SchrieberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wright v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Southern Underwriters v. BoswellTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sproles Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. JugeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. JenkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. HuntsmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API