Legal Opinion

Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Schrieber

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1922No. 726. [fn*]PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Strike Brief.

WALKER, J.

Plaintiffs in error have undertaken to brief this case under the rules promulgated by the Supreme Court on the 22d day of June, 1921 (230 S. W. vii).

They have complied with the rules in making a reasonable succinct statement of the nature and result of the suit, but they have not submitted propositions upon which they predicate their appeal, as provided by Rule 30, 230 S. W. vii. All they have done is to bring forward a number of their assignments of error and designate them as being “Points Involved.” Some of these purported assignments appear to he…

2Cited by60 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Texas Indemnity Insurance v. StaggsTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Brokaw v. CollettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ParrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API