Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seay
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1932No. 6371PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Maryland Casualty Company sued at law in the District Court under the Texas workmen’s compensation statute (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq.) to set aside an award against it as insurer made by the Industrial Accident Board for compensation to *323O. M. Seay for a total and permanent injury incurred by Mm on January 24, 1930, while employed by Alamo Metal Welding Company. Seay answered, setting up his claim against the casualty company, and it replied, denying all the material allegations. Seay obtained a judgment for weekly payments of $20 per week for 401 weeks,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Hartline v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1960
- Simmons v. Western Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933