Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seay

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1933No. 6901Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

This case after its reversal, Maryland Casualty Company v. Seay (C. C. A.) 56 F.(2d) 322, was retried to a jury with a second verdict for Seay, Maryland Casualty Company appealing. The more serious assignments of error relate to the question of the authority of McCamish as subagent of Eichlitz to bind Maryland Casualty Company by an oral contract of insurance. There is sufficient evidence to authorize the finding that McCamish did make the asserted oral contract in behalf of Maryland Casualty Company. Mrs. Whitlock, the employer, testified: “He mentioned early in January…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API