Legal Opinion

House v. Filgo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Defendants in error sued plaintiff in error to recover a vendor’s lien note for $829.58, alleging conversion by plaintiff in error. John G. Wilson, who held the note pending the dispute between plaintiff in error and defendants in error, was made a party defendant. Plaintiff in error denied the conversion and by special plea alleged that the note had been assigned to him by defendants in error to secure payment of a debt of $750 due him by the defendant in error Henry Filgo. This plea was followed by prayer for appropriate protection in that behalf. A jury was waived, and trial was had before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. ForsythTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hatchett v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. San Antonio Gas Co. v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Ables v. DonleyTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. MarcellesTexas Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Feagins v. Texas MacHinery & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Smith v. Folmar.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Temple Lumber Co. v. PulliamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API