Legal Opinion

Friends of Eugene v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2004No. 2003-188; A124714Published

1Opinion of the Court

DEITS, J. pro tempore

Petitioner Coalition for Health Options in Central Eugene-Springfield (CHOICES) seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision, affirming the City of Eugene’s (the city) ordinance amending its zoning code to make “it easier to site hospitals in certain residential and industrial zones.”1 Friends of Eugene v. City of Eugene, 46 Or LUBA 721, 722 (2004). Because we conclude that the city’s ordinance is inconsistent with the Metro Plan, LUBA’s order affirming the ordinance is unlawful in substance. Accordingly, we reverse and remand. ORS 197.850(9)(a).

As LUBA…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Waterwatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Jaqua v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Friends of Eugene v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API