Legal Opinion

Friends of Eugene v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2004No. 2003-188; A124714PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioners Coalition for Health Options in Central Eugene-Springfield (CHOICES) and Friends of Eugene seek judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in which LUBA affirmed the city’s amendment of its zoning code that “makes it easier to site hospitals in certain residential and industrial zones.” Friends of Eugene v. City of Eugene, 46 Or LUBA 721, 722 (2004). In its answering brief, respondent the City of Eugene (city) moved to dismiss this judicial review on the ground that petitioners have not demonstrated that they have standing. Specifically, the city asserted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Doty v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Doty v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Kragt v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Friends of Eugene v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API