Gordon R. Johnson v. Exxonmobil Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
Gordon Johnson claims that he was terminated from his job at ExxonMobil Corp. (“Exxon”) because of his age and because he suffers from epilepsy. He has therefore filed claims under both the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). Johnson has also applied for, and received, Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits. On his application for those benefits, he stated.that he has been unable to work because of his disability, epilepsy, since the date that he was terminated from Exxon. Exxon filed a motion for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Roger COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the BUDD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Dolores J. Fuka v. Thomson Consumer ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brown v. WattersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Federal Communications Commission v. Airadigm Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Matthew D. Vacca, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Division of Workers' Compensation, and Brian May, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- American Country Insurance Co. v. Chicago Carriage Cab Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Stragapede v. City of EvanstonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.