International Boom Co. v. Rainy Lake River Boom Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From an order of the district court for Beltrami county, Spooner, J., denying its motion that the directed verdict in favor of plaintiffs be set aside and for a new trial, defendant appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The character oi this action fully appears in the opinion filed on a former appeal and reported in 97 Minn. 513, 107 N. W. 735. It will not be necessary to repeat what was there said. The action was in claim and delivery for the possession of certain logs, which the defendant claimed the right to hold until it was paid certain fees, which it claimed under and by virtue of chapter 221, p. 350, Laws 1889. The case was tried before a- court and jury, and a verdict directed in favor of the plaintiffs for the possession of the logs. On appeal to this court the order of the trial court denying a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- International Boom Co. v. Rainy Lake River Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Neary v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
- Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- International Boom Co. v. Rainy Lake River Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Namakan Lumber Co. v. Rainy Lake River Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.