United States v. Ashton
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Michelle Ashton’s Motion [120] to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant claims that her Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial was violated when the trial judge instructed the jury that the question of materiality was a matter for the court to determine. Defendant moves the Court to vacate her convictions and sentence. Upon consideration of the Motion [120], defendant’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion [139], the government’s Opposition [146], the entire record herein, and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Feliciano-Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- United States v. CunninghamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.