Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Aetna Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 2, 2007No. 04 Civ. 1440(RJH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
This diversity action is brought by plaintiff, Trevor Charles Clarke (“Clarke”), against defendant, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), challenging Aetna’s decision to terminate Clarke’s long term disability benefits. Clarke alleges that Aetna’s termination breached the insurance contract between Aetna and his employer and seeks damages and declaratory relief. Aetna moves for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against Clarke’s complaint in its entirety. For the reasons stated below, Aetna’s motion [24]…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lopez v. Gap, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Jones v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Colby v. Assurant Employee BenefitsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009