Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Wesolowski

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1973PublishedCited by 397 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Where the insured’s automobile struck one oncoming vehicle, ricocheted off and struck a second more than 100 feet away, was there more than one “ occurrence ” within the meaning of the provision fixing limits of liability in an automobile insurance policy?

Appellant moved for summary judgment in an action by it for a declaration that the claims filed by respondents against its insured, Gerald Koningisor, all arose out of a single ‘ ‘ occurrence ” under the terms of the applicable automobile insurance policy. Supreme Court, Brie County, denied the motion on the *171ground that it was a question of…

2Cited by397 opinions

  1. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

392 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API