Legal Opinion

Great Southern Life Insurance Co. v. Employee Fringe Benefits, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 14, 1982No. YY-411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This controversy involves the validity of an agreement for rescission of certain “key man” life insurance policies. Employee Fringe Benefits (Employee), owner and beneficiary of the rescinded policies, sued Great Southern Life Insurance Company (Great Southern) for recovery on the policies. Great Southern defended on the grounds that the policies had been rescinded by agreement between it and Employee, for a valuable consideration, that all claims under the policies had been satisfied by payment, and that Employee had released Great Southern from all further liability on the policies. Great…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kowalke v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sears v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Riegel v. American Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Boyd v. Aetna Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  5. Seidman v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Great Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1983
  2. State v. JoynerCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API