Legal Opinion

William v. . Sasser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

It is conceded in the briefs of the parties that the rule in' Shelley's case is not involved for the reason that the superadded words “equally divided between the lawful begotten heirs of her body” bar its application. Ward v. Jones, 40 N. C., 400; Mills v. Thorne, 95 N. C., 362; Jones v. Whichard, 163 N. C., 244; Haar v. Schloss, 169 N. C., 228; Blackledge v. Simmons, 180 N. C., 535.

Therefore, Martha L. Williams, the grantee in the deed, took thereunder a life estate only with remainder to be “equally divided between the lawful begotten heirs of her body,” it being further provided that “at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Tayloe v. MosherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  3. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Puckett v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Jones v. . WhichardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Scales v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Welch v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Whitson v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Blanchard v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API