Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Ward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1956No. 454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant takes the position that the remainder interest of the child, Robert Gibson Blanchard, at the time of his death was contingent. Therefore, he contends that the provisions of G.S. 41-4 are controlling and the roll call may not be had until the death of A. G. Blanchard, the first taker, who is one of the plaintiffs herein. House v. House, 231 N.C. 218, 56 S.E. 2d 695; Patterson v. McCormick, 177 N.C. 448, 99 S.E. 401; Rees v. Williams, 165 N.C. 201, 81 S.E. 286; Perrett v. Bird, 152 N.C. 220, 67 S.E. 507; Dawson v. Ennett, 151 N.C. 543, 66 S.E. 566; Williams v. Lewis, 100 N.C. 142,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Buchanan v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Rees v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Chas. W. Priddy & Co. v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Larmon v. LarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Cannon v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Lawson v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Privett v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API