Legal Opinion
Lampen v. Albert Trostel & Sons Co. Employee Welfare Plan
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 28, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-C-1359PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before this court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment and a cross-motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Jim Lampen (“Lampen”). Lampen has sued his company’s welfare plan and the plan’s claims administrators for damages resulting from the denial of medical benefits. Title 29, § 1132(a)(1)(B), (e)(1) of the United States Code grant this court jurisdiction over this ease. For the reasons stated below, this court will grant the defendants’ motions for summary judgment and dismiss this case.
FACTS
At all times…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Joyce A. Gelardi v. Pertec Computer Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rosalie Pohl, Steve Pohl, Peter Kellner, and Linda Kellner v. National Benefits Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bryan D. Tourdot v. Rockford Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Haidle v. Chippenham Hospital, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Samaritan Health Center v. Simplicity Health Care PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- Sumpter v. MacK Chicago Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Tourdot v. Rockford Health Plans, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.