Legal Opinion

Crisp v. Medlin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1965No. 537PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParkeR, J.

Defendant Frances Lane Medlin admits in her answer that in November 1962 she owned a 1957 Chevrolet automobile as a family purpose automobile, and that Franklin Odell Medlin was a member of her family.

Plaintiff’s evidence shows the following facts: On 12 November 1962 James Thomas Lane, a 15-year old boy, was living with his mother, Gertrude Crisp. About 10:30 p.m. on the night of this day her son left her home in a 1957 Chevrolet automobile driven by Franklin Odell Medlin for the purpose of helping his father, Curtis Medlin, who was a passenger in the automobile, clean out a well. They went…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Brown v. . KinseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Lane v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drumwright v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. PEOPLES BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. SnowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Davis v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Hoggard v. UmphlettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Wilson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API