PEOPLES BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Snowden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
This appeal involves only the question whether plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to take the case to the jury on the issue of defendant’s actionable negligence. It presents once again this frequently recurring situation to which there are no eyewitnesses: An automobile leaves the highway, upsets or collides with some object, and thereby causes personal injury or death. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable to such cases, for negligence is not presumed from the mere fact that a vehicle veers off the highway. Crisp v. Medlin, 264 N.C. 314, 141 S.E. 2d 609; Yates v. Chappell, 263…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Yates v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Randall v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Drumwright v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Crisp v. MedlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Kekelis v. Whitin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Lassiter v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968