Legal Opinion

People v. Sanchez

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1939No. Crim. 1692PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, P. J. —

Defendant and one Campos were jointly charged and separately tried for an attempt to commit robbery. Prom the judgment of conviction of Sanchez he prosecutes this appeal, as well as from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Two points are here urged: First, the information failed to state a public offense; and second, that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment.

The information sets forth that “the said .Angelo Campos and Adolph Sanchez are accused by the District Attorney ... by this information, of the crime of attempt to commit robbery, a felony,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. The People v. BonfantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. BormannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. FoscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API