Legal Opinion

Kenner v. Kenner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sullivan County. — Hon. Hal H. Haynes, Judge Opinion 'on petition to Rehear

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Ohiee Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The point chiefly stressed is that by the decree in the Alabama suit the complainant was deprived of his property without due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, in that by it he was deprived of the services of his child, without having been made a party by personal service of process.

The contention, although put forward with the utmost seriousness, has nevertheless an element of unconscious humor; for it is impossible to perceive how a girl baby less than two years old can perform any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. McKelvey v. McKelveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Harris v. James B. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Churchill v. ChurchillTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API