Legal Opinion
Catalyst Energy Development Corp. v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 9, 1986No. 85 Civ. 4735 (LFM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Defendant, Iron Mountain Mines, Inc. (“IMMI”), moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
FACTS
In February 1984, plaintiff, Catalyst Energy Development Corporation (“Catalyst”), a New York corporation, entered into an agreement with IMMI, a corporation headquartered in California, whereby Catalyst agreed to fund a hydroelectric project on property owned by IMMI in Red-ding, California. The agreement was executed in Sacramento, California, and required Catalyst to make an initial down…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lancaster v. ZüfleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Glass v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Melkaz International Inc. v. Flavor Innovation Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.