Legal Opinion
Lancaster v. Züfle
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1996No. 95 CV 3932 (BDP)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PARKER, District Judge.
FACTS
This action to recover on a debt is before this court on Defendant’s motion for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). The complaint alleges that Defendant Elodie C. Züfle (“Züfle”), on behalf of Silent Partner Body Armor, Inc. (“SPBA”), signed a promissory note payable to Chemical Bank of New York and a security agreement authorizing Chemical Bank of *40New York to sell collateral that had been pledged by Plaintiff Edwin B. Lancaster (“Lancaster”) in the event of a default on the note. Lancaster executed letters of consent…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Sun Forest Corp. v. ShviliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Unlimited Care, Inc. v. Visiting Nurse Ass'n of Eastern Massachusetts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.