Legal Opinion

Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1898No. L. A. No. 380PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa. Barbara County. W. B. Cope, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover certain-royalties on certain bituminous rock and liquid asphaltum mined by defendants, for which they agreed to pay “the sum of fifty cents per ton for each and every gross ton.” The trial court, found “that the term ‘gross ton’ as used in the lease .... means two thousand two hundred and forty pounds,” and gave judgment for plaintiff accordingly. From this judgment plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone. His contention is, that the ton contemplated by the contract is a ton of two thousand pounds. A contract of precisely the same terms, in…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gardiner v. McDonoghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API