Legal Opinion
Harry Hoy and Michael R. Schuster v. Progress Pattern Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1954No. 12149_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants by this action sought to recover from the appellee, Progress Pattern Company, unpaid overtime compensation and liquidated damages pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, Sec. 216(b), Title 29 U.S. C.A.
The complaint alleges that the appel-lee, a Michigan corporation, was, during the period herein involved, engaged in the production of goods for interstate commerce; that the appellant, Harry Hoy, was an employee of the appellee during said time; that during the period of August 24, 1951 to August 10, 1953, the ap-pellee employed appellant in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Begnaud v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Chappell v. GoltsmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Estepp v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Burton S. Knapp v. John P. Kinsey, John P. Kinsey v. Burton S. KnappCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.