Legal Opinion

Fox v. Schumann

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Assumpsit by Florence Fox, a minor, by next friend, in justice’s court against Augusta Schumann and Christopher Schumann for breach of contract. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appealed to the •circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff against defendant Augusta Schumann, who brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This case was commenced in a justice’s court of Bay county, where judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor against both defendants. They appealed to the circuit court of said county, where, upon retrial by jury, a judgment of no cause of action was rendered in favor of defendant Christopher Schumann, and plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment *333for $225 against defendant Augusta Schumann, who-brings the case to this court for review upon a writ or error.

Defendants are husband and wife, and at the time this action arose lived together as such in Bangor township, Bay county, Mich., where he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bolthouse v. De SpelderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hirshfield v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Meads v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Howe v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Goodman v. ShipleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Jean ToviaveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Schultz v. Pomplon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Block v. KelseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API